Re: Again no multi6 at IETF#56

[Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>]

Kurt;

> >>>>> Are you saying it already belongs to where it belongs that there
> >>>>> should be no BoF?
> >>>>>
> >>>> I am saying that address registration and allocation/assignment
> >>>> management belongs with the RIRs.
> >>>
> >>> How, do you think, it should be managed?
> >>>
> >>> "just like IPv4" is not an answer.
> >>>
> >>
> >> And your suggestion is?
> >
> > Have a consensus at multi6 meetings.
> >
> 
> On assignment policy and registration?

Of course.

It is impossible for RIRs to define an assignment policy unless
they recognize how multihomed sites should be treated.

							Masataka Ohta