RE: Again no multi6 at IETF#56

["Michel Py" <michel@arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us>]

> Tony Li wrote:
> I think we're missing the big picture here. Handing
> out addresses before you understand how addresses
> will be used is not a good idea. We did this in IPv4
> and it resulted in the swamp.
> To not make this mistake again, we need to have a
> firm routing architecture for v6 in hand that includes
> support for multi-homing as a first level,
> non-scalability-impacting element.
> We are not there yet.

I could not agree more.

Michel.