[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Again no multi6 at IETF#56
drc;
> >> > A better way to move forward is most likely to have the IETF
> >> > _cooperate_ with the RIRs on a working policy.
> >> bingo!
> > YES!
>
> Perhaps, say, Thomas Narten, Takeshi Arano, or David Kessens could work
> with ARIN and the other RIRs to come up with IPv6 policies?
None of them is IETF.
Moreover,
> Or maybe
> folks from IPng like Bob Hinden could run drafts of proposals for
> addressing architectures by the RIRs for input?
IPng WG has no idea on addressing architecture for multihoming.
IPng WG has no idea on how global routing table size should
be managed.
Masataka Ohta