[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Again no multi6 at IETF#56

To: "Tony Li" <Tony.Li@procket.com>,"Bound, Jim" <Jim.Bound@hp.com>,"Randy Bush" <randy@psg.com>,"Kurt Erik Lindqvist" <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>
Subject: RE: Again no multi6 at IETF#56
From: "Michel Py" <michel@arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us>
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 13:22:27 -0800
Cc: "Bob Hinden" <hinden@iprg.nokia.com>,<multi6@ops.ietf.org>

> Tony Li wrote:
> 3) Change the semantics of a v6 address.

Wow that's a little too extreme for my taste.

Michel.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Again no multi6 at IETF#56
  - From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>

Prev by Date: Re: Move forward
Next by Date: Re: Again no multi6 at IETF#56
Previous by thread: RE: Again no multi6 at IETF#56
Next by thread: Re: Again no multi6 at IETF#56
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread