Re: Again no multi6 at IETF#56

[Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>]

Kurt;

> >> I think you need to go and check the RIR policies. They are not the
> >> same. They are similar, but not the same.
> >
> > They don't have to be similar but they have to be consistent.
> 
> Which is what I meant and what they are.

How can you be sure they are consistent? Note that they may not
be similar.

> >> Besides that, the RIRs have a similar policy in order not create
> >> competition for a resource that is considered limited and i order to
> >> limit routing table growth (the problem that is trying to be solved by
> >> having the IETF set the policy) . If the resource is not limited and
> >> routing table growth is not an issue, let each RIR set their own 
> >> policy.
> >
> > Wrong. If the resource is not limited and routing table growth is
> > not an issue, don't let each RIR set their own policy. Just assign
> > as much resource as demanded.
> 
> The resource is limited.

Then, we need some policy to deny some assignment based on the
technical reasoning on why, how and how seriously the resource
is limited.

							Masataka Ohta