[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Again no multi6 at IETF#56

To: Jim.Bound@hp.com, multi6@ops.ietf.org
Subject: RE: Again no multi6 at IETF#56
From: "J. Noel Chiappa" <jnc@ginger.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 13:02:15 -0500
Cc: hinden@iprg.nokia.com, jnc@ginger.lcs.mit.edu

    > From: "Bound, Jim" <Jim.Bound@hp.com>

    > I am suspect of the entire notion of the separation, which just being
    > technically accute having heard many solutions to this over the years.

Those many solutions would includ MIPv6, right Jim?

	Noel

Prev by Date: Re: Again no multi6 at IETF#56
Next by Date: Re: Move forward
Previous by thread: RE: Again no multi6 at IETF#56
Next by thread: RE: Again no multi6 at IETF#56
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread