[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: HIP and PKI reqs [RE: Identifier/locator recap]

To: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
Subject: Re: HIP and PKI reqs [RE: Identifier/locator recap]
From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 05:19:40 +0200 (EET)
Cc: multi6@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <200303180033.h2I0X5H2012846@marajade.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>

On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Michael Richardson wrote:
> >>>>> "Pekka" == Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi> writes:
>     Pekka> However, my complaint with HIP model is that it seems so closely
>     Pekka> tied to 
>     Pekka> ESP and security.  
> 
>   Why is this a problem for you?

Two words: Middleboxes, policy. 

Yeah, those are something that security hackers aren't concerned about..

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings

References:
- Re: HIP and PKI reqs [RE: Identifier/locator recap]
  - From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>

Prev by Date: Re: Again no multi6 at IETF#56
Next by Date: RE: Reducing Peerings for MH Routing within a site via end systems
Previous by thread: Re: HIP and PKI reqs [RE: Identifier/locator recap]
Next by thread: Re: HIP and PKI reqs [RE: Identifier/locator recap]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread