[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Longer prefixes

To: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>
Subject: Re: Longer prefixes
From: Ole Troan <ot@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 00:05:51 +0000
Cc: multi6@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <BFB88769-5D54-11D7-B5E2-000393AB1404@kurtis.pp.se> (Kurt ErikLindqvist's message of "Sun, 23 Mar 2003 18:27:40 +0100")
References: <BFB88769-5D54-11D7-B5E2-000393AB1404@kurtis.pp.se>
User-agent: Gnus/5.090011 (Oort Gnus v0.11) Emacs/21.2.95(sparc-sun-solaris2.8)

> As there was some discussions in Atlanta on wether longer prefixes is
> actually in use today. This is just the first page of sh ipv6 route on
> one of my home routers :

ipv6-lab-gw>show ipv6 route summary
IPv6 Routing Table Summary - 730 entries
  167 local, 84 connected, 38 static, 6 RIP, 435 BGP 0 IS-IS, 0 OSPF
  Number of prefixes:
    /8: 1, /10: 1, /16: 1, /24: 47, /28: 49, /32: 207, /33: 2, /34: 2
    /35: 54, /36: 2, /40: 6, /42: 1, /44: 4, /48: 94, /64: 85, /96: 1
    /112: 1, /125: 1, /126: 4, /127: 1, /128: 166

/ot

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Longer prefixes
  - From: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Re: Longer prefixes
  - From: Brian E Carpenter <brian@hursley.ibm.com>

References:
- Longer prefixes
  - From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>

Prev by Date: Re: Start running
Next by Date: Re: Again no multi6 at IETF#56
Previous by thread: Longer prefixes
Next by thread: Re: Longer prefixes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread