Re: Again no multi6 at IETF#56

[Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>]

> > Agreed, still we need to try and guess when that will be. Mostly 
> > because that will set the agenda. I would be interested in seeing 
> > what the trend curves for the IPv6 routing table looks like from the 
> > people monitoring these. But I am not sure if Geoff Huston or Gert 
> > During for example are on this list.
> There are not enough significant data points to do any sort of trend 
> analysis at this point in time.  I agree with Tony -- as a person who 
> personally still gets criticized for the fact that China doesn't have 
> as much address space as MIT, we will regret not addressing the 
> multi-homing (and related) issues now, before "historical mistakes" 
> become permanent.
Well, I haven't said that we should deploy or standardize multiple 
solutions necessarily.

> Further, if we address the multi-homing (and related) issues, there 
> will be a clear and obvious justification for IPv6 deployment which 
> has not, to date, been made.
I am not convinced that comes out of the multi6 problem alone.

- kurtis -