Re: Longer prefixes

["Robert J. Rockell" <rrockell@sprint.net>]

Is this a broken filter, or needed de-aggregation? I would expect the
former.     Has there been any official move away from 2772 for production
space?

Thanks
Rob Rockell
SprintLink
(+1) 703-689-6322
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

On Sun, 23 Mar 2003, Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote:

->
->
->As there was some discussions in Atlanta on wether longer prefixes is
->actually in use today. This is just the first page of sh ipv6 route on
->one of my home routers :
->
->IPv6 Routing Table - 438 entries
->Codes: C - Connected, L - Local, S - Static, R - RIP, B - BGP
->        I1 - ISIS L1, I2 - ISIS L2, IA - ISIS interarea
->Timers: Uptime/Expires
->
->B   2001:200:126::/48 [20/6]
->      via FE80::C15E:FA3A, Tunnel10, 02:22:30/never
->B   2001:200:202::/48 [20/6]
->      via FE80::C15E:FA3A, Tunnel10, 02:22:56/never
->B   2001:200:203::/48 [20/6]
->      via FE80::C15E:FA3A, Tunnel10, 4d01h/never
->B   2001:200:200::/40 [20/5]
->      via 2001:670:87:3001::, Tunnel10, 4d01h/never
->B   2001:200:340::/48 [20/6]
->      via FE80::C15E:FA3A, Tunnel10, 4d01h/never
->B   2001:200:300::/40 [20/6]
->      via FE80::C15E:FA3A, Tunnel10, 4d01h/never
->B   2001:200:500::/40 [20/3]
->      via FE80::C15E:FA3A, Tunnel10, 5d17h/never
->B   2001:200::/35 [20/3]
->      via 2001:670:87:3001::, Tunnel10, 3d03h/never
->B   2001:208::/32 [20/5]
->      via 2001:670:87:3001::, Tunnel10, 3d03h/never
->B   2001:218::/32 [20/3]
->      via 2001:670:87:3001::, Tunnel10, 1d06h/never
->B   2001:220::/35 [20/4]
->      via FE80::82F4:B4, Tunnel30, 02:51:25/never
->B   2001:228:C00::/40 [20/5]
->      via 2001:670:87:3001::, Tunnel10, 4d01h/never
->
->
->It appears as if there are number of prefix lengths being in use.
->
->Best regards,
->
->- kurtis -
->
->