Re: provider-int geo aggr [Re: plug: thesis on site multihoming]

[Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>]

On dinsdag, apr 1, 2003, at 13:07 Europe/Amsterdam, Dorian Kim wrote:

> I guess if one stays around long enough, one gets to see all old 
> arguments
> rehashed, regardless of how definitive the result of the last round 
> was.
> Geographical address assignment and aggregation was discussed 
> extensively
> and rejected in big-internet mailing list circa 1994-5 during the
> discussions leading up to the publication of RFC 2008.
> The list archive is available at 
> ftp://munnari.oz.au/big-internet/list-archive
Cool. I've searched 1994 and 1995 for "geo" and I found a lot of 
debate. However, I did not find any definitive results.