Re: Resolving geo discussions

[Brian E Carpenter <brian@hursley.ibm.com>]

I agree. Actually I am hoping to see more from the co-chairs,
not less.

Now seriously about renumbering, it is something that IPv6 facilitates,
but we still haven't taken the sting out of it, and that is
a challenge yet to be solved. Not in this WG though.

   Brian

Tony Li wrote:
> 
> Nay.  And the ad hominem remarks are out of place here.
> 
> Tony
> 
> |    -----Original Message-----
> |    From: Sean Doran [mailto:smd@ab.use.net]
> |    Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2003 9:30 PM
> |    To: Michel Py
> |    Cc: Sean Doran; multi6@ops.ietf.org
> |    Subject: Re: Resolving geo discussions
> |
> |
> |
> |    On Wednesday, Apr 16, 2003, at 03:53 Europe/London, Michel
> |    Py wrote:
> |
> |    > A site would renumber twice a year?
> |    >
> |    > Sean, go back to sleep. You are a disgrace to this ML.
> |
> |    Why?  Because I meet in the market place enterprises
> |    which deploy NATs explicitly to facilitate exactly this?
> |
> |    Prices are falling.  People want short-term contracts with
> |    few strings.
> |
> |    I apologize for uttering this horrifically disgraceful statement,
> |    and will comply with your wish, if there is rough consensus from
> |    the rest of the WG.
> |
> |       Sean.