Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-04.txt

[Sean Doran <smd@ab.use.net>]

On Wednesday, Apr 16, 2003, at 15:55 Europe/London, Brian E Carpenter 
wrote:

> Joe Abley wrote:
> >      <t>Any changes to routing practices made to accommodate 
> > multihomed
> >        sites should not cause non-multihomed sites to become more
"or the core"  -- so perhaps 'other parts of the Internet, including 
non-multihomed sites'.

> I think that is good. I'll certainly concede to you and Sean
> on my own suggestion, but I fear we will get pushback from
> the IESG if we produce a solution that does weaken security.
There will be even more immediate pushback (i.e., well before IESG)
if we can't justify any trade-offs between utility and security which 
favour
the former.   Hopefully a compelling justification will lessen any 
pushback,
assuming any new vulnerabilities / weaknesses are known to exist in
whatever work emanates from here.

	Sean.