Re: WG last-call draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-04.txt

[Brian E Carpenter <brian@hursley.ibm.com>]

Hold it!!!

I sent several editorial comments on April 16, that Joe stated he would
include, and there was one substantive comment on the security considerations,
where I think there was an agreed change.

So at the minimum there has to be an -05 version.

Also, a last call that arrived 03:00 Monday and expires 12:00 Monday
seems a little short ;-)

   Brian

Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote:
> 
> [ post by non-subscriber.  with the massive amount of spam, it is easy to miss
>   and therefore delete posts by non-subscribers.  if you wish to regularly
>   post from an address that is not subscribed to this mailing list, send a
>   message to <listname>-owner@ops.ietf.org and ask to have the alternate
>   address added to the list of addresses from which submissions are
>   automatically accepted. ]
> 
> Unless there are more comments on the above draft by Monday 12.00 CET
> we will send the above draft to the IESG.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> - kurtis -