Re: yesterday

[Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


> Some random thoughts on the session yesterday:

Wait! This is what we are supposed to do tomorrow! :-)

> Also, some mechanisms (such as SCTP) need API changes. I think this is 
> EXTREMELY dangerous as this is a huge stumbling block for IPv6 
> adoption. The latest OSes support IPv6 and getting a tunnel or 6to4 is 
> fairly trivial, but we the reason why there is very little IPv6 
> adoption is that the applications simply fail to use it when it's 
> available. This is something we absolutely can't have with 
> multihoming, in my not so humble opinion.

I think this brings up the issues from the IAB meeting yesterday, what 
do we want to change when. That we need to change large parts at some 
point, I think is clear. Question is if this will really influence IPv6 
adoption or not (if the change takes us 10+ years - after we have 
consensus, is it really an issue). And what we do in the mean time. It 
will be interesting to see what the IAB comes up with.


I personally think that Brians presentation from yesterdays IAB meeting 
was very good and pointed to the problems. And the problems with the 
solutions.

- - kurtis -

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.2

iQA/AwUBPxO92aarNKXTPFCVEQKSUACdEWJEOqFgtcgSab4QYjF6KVdi8MUAniXX
FoQzoX5uF9SLyGyc3EwHUQhN
=priV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----