Re: Minutes / Notes

[Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>]

> >>>> I guess Iljitsch was talking about stateless autoconfig RFC 2462
> >>>
> >>> RFC2462 does not give any useful definition of autoconfiguration.
> >>>
> >>> For example, in DNSOP WG, people, including those of IPv6 ones,
> >>> are discussing autoconfiguration with DHCP.
> >>
> >> Yes. But in the meeting it was pointed out after your question that
> >> this was referring to the features described in 2462.
> >
> > And, then, it was pointed out that RFC 2462 is useless to define
> > autoconfiguration.
> 
> Noone said that 2462 gives the definition of autoconfiguration.

Wrong.

My question is on definition of autoconfiguration of the
presentation by Iljitsch.

Iljitsch could not provide any answer.

As I further asked, Erik said that 2462 gives the definition of
the autoconfiguration of the presentation.

And, then, it was pointed out that RFC 2462 is useless to define
autoconfiguration.

> I think that anything that can improve the security of todays Internet, 
> tomorrows Internet and yesterdays Internet will be looked upon 
> favorably.

An abstract nonsense.

							Masataka Ohta