Re: Consensus on identifier/locator split?

["Spencer Dawkins" <spencer@mcsr-labs.org>]

I agree with Thierry here, both in my personal support and my
curiosity about
the right place for the discussion to take place. On the other hand,

- multi6 does have a charter that leads in this topic area, and

- while an OPS area working group isn't the right place to do major
protocol/
  architecture changes, it's not a bad place to think about the
impacts of those
  changes.

Spencer

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Thierry Ernst" <ernst@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
To: <multi6@ops.ietf.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 10:52 PM
Subject: Re: Consensus on identifier/locator split?


>
> I would personally support that path, but is multi6 the right
working
> group for a genenal purposed loc+id separation solution ? If the
idea is
> to standardize a solution which can be used for multihoming,
mobility,
> etc - (which I would like to see happening), I think it goes further
> than the multi6 charter.