[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: MIPv6 hopeless

To: Tim Shepard <shep@alum.mit.edu>
Subject: Re: MIPv6 hopeless
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 11:25:19 +0859 ()
Cc: multi6@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <200308210153.h7L1r7tU005457@ginger.lcs.mit.edu> from Tim Shepardat "Aug 20, 2003 09:53:07 pm"

Tim Shepard;

> > A properly designed mobility protocol should support multiple
> > home agents at multiple locations.
> 
> And I would also like to see support for the homeless mobile node.
> So "multiple home agents" should range from zero to many.

I'm afraid that the analogy between multihoming and mobility
works here and that the homeless mobile node will be as useful
as a zero homed sites in which hosts have zero prefixes.

							Masataka Ohta

Follow-Ups:
- Re: MIPv6 hopeless
  - From: Pekka Nikander <pekka.nikander@nomadiclab.com>

References:
- Re: MIPv6 hopeless
  - From: Tim Shepard <shep@alum.mit.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: MIPv6 hopeless
Next by Date: Re: MIPv6 hopeless
Previous by thread: Re: MIPv6 hopeless
Next by thread: Re: MIPv6 hopeless
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread