Re: Fwd: A comment about MAST

["Eugene M. Kim" <gene@nttmcl.com>]

On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 12:40:09PM +0859, Masataka Ohta wrote:
> But, that is not you argument, at all.
> 
> You proposed to have API to accomodate MAST which also accomodate NAT,
> which shows your love for NAT.
> 
> Your proposal is to keep MAST and NAT forever.

I don't understand.  What I proposed is an API that communicates socket
endpoint address changes to the application layer; how does that API
accomodate/facilitate NAT?

> 
> > Finally, I'm afraid I cannot fully see what you said in your postscript;
> > could you elaborate?
> 
> Just say LIN6.

Thank you for the pointer. =)

Eugene