[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fwd: A comment about MAST
Eugene, et al,
>> > If I understood you correctly, your concern seems to be that, with the
>> > proposed MAST API, some applications are required to be modified just to
>> > suit MAST as they had to with NAT. Is this correct?
>> Wrong. There is no MAST API. It is NAT API. Applications for the API
>> is, behind NAT, notified address of a NAT box and tell it to its peer.
EMK> Not verbatim. In order for that to work, a new protocol is needed
EMK> between a NAT gateway and machines behind it so the gateway can notify
EMK> address changes to them.
NAT boxes do address translation and MAST does address translation. In a very
theoretical sense there is, therefore, some similarity between them. However
MAST is not a "network" address translation service and it really has nothing
to do with the controversy surrounding NATs.
So I am not understanding criticism of MAST that is essentially a continuation
of the criticism about NATs. They are separate and I think the debates should
be kept separate.
As for a "MAST API", none is needed.
MAST hides the multiple addresses from transport and above. That is one of
its features.
I believe that any application protocol that uses direct IP addresses has a
problem with any multi-homing/mobility solution.
Also, as soon as the application needs to benefit from knowing about -- and
giving guidance about -- the availability of multiple addresses, then it needs
an be nice to enhanced API. That is true for any multi-addressing solution,
not just MAST.
EMK> To the best of my knowledge, none of the
EMK> existing IETF protocols do this, much less can MAST.
Correct.
EMK> I think you are
EMK> worried about something that does not even exist.
Correct.
>> You miss the point that MAST does not solve *THE* problem
>> and is useless even as an intermediate solution.
EMK> I'm afraid you did not communicate what was `*THE* problem' you were
EMK> trying to solve here.
Yes, it would be nice to hear a clear and coherent description of "the"
problem.
d/
--
Dave Crocker <dcrocker-at-brandenburg-dot-com>
Brandenburg InternetWorking <www.brandenburg.com>
Sunnyvale, CA USA <tel:+1.408.246.8253>