Re: RIR bashing, was: Routing table size?

[masataka ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>]

Iljitsch;

> > > Giving out /32s ONLY in IPv6 and /20s mostly in IPv4 isn't a good 
> > > policy. Sometimes people need to be globally visible without the need 
> > > for such a large block, and the largest ISPs burn through them fast 
> > > enough to warrant giving them much larger blocks.
>
>
> > Large? How large?
>
>
> Double the size of each next block? Probably want to stop doing that at 
> some point, though...

Huh? Next block? Double?

> Actually it doesn't work like that in IPv4 either.

Though I can't understand you, you should fight in some RIR on
IPv4 issues, first.

> It seems reasonable that everyone with an AS number will want to have an 
> IPv6 address block at some point. That's nearly 30k at this moment.

That's fine.

							Masataka Ohta