Re: Routing table size?

To: Ray Plzak <plzak@arin.net>
Subject: Re: Routing table size?
From: masataka ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 00:40:29 +0900
Cc: multi6@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <000501c390d5$40674790$1e8888c0@arin.net>
References: <000501c390d5$40674790$1e8888c0@arin.net>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)

Ray;

This list is the appropriate place to ask questions about current policy
as well as suggest changes to existing policy or even propose new
policy.

Propose new policy based on which specification?

Can the specification not necessarily the current IPv6 as is?

Masataka Ohta

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Routing table size?
  - From: "Ray Plzak" <plzak@arin.net>

References:
- RE: Routing table size?
  - From: "Ray Plzak" <plzak@arin.net>