RE: I-D ACTION:draft-nordmark-multi6-sim-01.txt (Fwd)

["marcelo bagnulo" <mbagnulo@ing.uc3m.es>]

> As the spec notes, deferred validation of new locators adds
> complexity to the protocol.
>
> My question is, therefore, why you chose deferred validation,
> versus automatic validation?

I like defferred validation, becuase you don't incurr in aditional costs
until you really need to. I guess that most of the communication will only
use one locator during its lifetime, so it seems wasteful to verify multiple
locators in this case.

Regards, marcelo