[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Alternatives to source address rewriting (was RE: Preserving established communications (was RE: about draft-nordmark-multi6-noid-00)

To: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
Subject: Re: Alternatives to source address rewriting (was RE: Preserving established communications (was RE: about draft-nordmark-multi6-noid-00)
From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 11:53:55 +0100
Cc: <mbagnulo@ing.uc3m.es>, Multi6 Mailing List <multi6@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <4B1F3854-0E0A-11D8-A5FC-00039388672E@muada.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On måndag, nov 3, 2003, at 15:30 Europe/Stockholm, Iljitsch van Beijnum 
wrote:

>
> Current rules say you must have 200 customers that take IPv6 addresses 
> from you in two years. Now obviously there are going to be ISPs for 
> which this is a problem, but I don't see how we can arrive at very 
> large numbers of multihomed sites that use ISPs with less than 200 
> customers.

This is being changed though. See the discussion in ARIN and RIPE.

- - kurtis -

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.2

iQA/AwUBP6ooRaarNKXTPFCVEQISNgCdHhW8HWpN00l7npbuZ2Q1PF4SLDYAoPc6
sJgPVK5CNGPo+5Uq7FNCK+Gf
=syi/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:
- Re: Alternatives to source address rewriting (was RE: Preserving established communications (was RE: about draft-nordmark-multi6-noid-00)
  - From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Tentative agenda for Multi6 in Minneapolis
Next by Date: Re: Clash of IPv6 and Multi6 WG meetings
Previous by thread: Re: Alternatives to source address rewriting (was RE: Preserving established communications (was RE: about draft-nordmark-multi6-noid-00)
Next by thread: Re: Alternatives to source address rewriting (was RE: Preserving established communications (was RE: about draft-nordmark-multi6-noid-00)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread