RE: security requirement for multi6

["Tony Li" <Tony.Li@procket.com>]

Even more importantly, we shouldn't create new ones.  
Especially ones that are hard to detect.

This is an operations group: let's not make operations
any harder than they already are.

Tony


|  -----Original Message-----
|  From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist [mailto:kurtis@kurtis.pp.se] 
|  Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 8:07 PM
|  To: Iljitsch van Beijnum
|  Cc: Masataka Ohta; Multi6 Mailing List
|  Subject: Re: security requirement for multi6
|  
|  
|  -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|  Hash: SHA1
|  
|  
|  On torsdag, nov 13, 2003, at 00:33 Europe/Stockholm, Iljitsch van 
|  Beijnum wrote:
|  
|  >
|  >> That is, that you happen to find a way of DoS does not mean other
|  >> forms of DoS is not possible.
|  >
|  > Still, I think this new kind of denial of service is bad 
|  enough that 
|  > we shouldn't allow this to happen, even though other 
|  denial of service 
|  > attacks are also possible today. Hopefully we'll be able to do 
|  > something about that in the future.
|  
|  Just because there are DoS possibilities that we do not yet 
|  know about, 
|  does not mean that we should not fix the ones that we do know about, 
|  and also know how to fix.
|  
|  - - kurtis -
|  
|  -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
|  Version: PGP 8.0.2
|  
|  iQA/AwUBP7MDc6arNKXTPFCVEQKP9gCgmrXlIDufgH0oTTmMApuH/MbYT0AAoOpD
|  2XdyIYeP8hJV6stm1NrEeubW
|  =BfOR
|  -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|  
|  
|