Re: security requirement for multi6

[Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On torsdag, nov 13, 2003, at 05:27 Europe/Stockholm, Masataka Ohta 
wrote:

> Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote:
>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>> On torsdag, nov 13, 2003, at 00:33 Europe/Stockholm, Iljitsch van 
>> Beijnum wrote:
> Kurt;
>
>>> Still, I think this new kind of denial of service is bad enough that 
>>> we shouldn't allow this to happen, even though other denial of 
>>> service attacks are also possible today. Hopefully we'll be able to 
>>> do something about that in the future.
>> Just because there are DoS possibilities that we do not yet know 
>> about, does not mean that we should not fix the ones that we do know 
>> about, and also know how to fix.
>
> What is your point?
>
> The current situation is that there are DoS possibilities that we
> (I, at least) already know about.

In the id/loc separation case? That are not in Eriks draft? Then this 
is the time to list them. If you know how to work around them, even 
better.

- - kurtis -

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.2

iQA/AwUBP7OTQqarNKXTPFCVEQLgUgCffbd72B3JHBDc9XysM+N7nNTH1IMAoOqD
eB0AP4PXK1C2O1m117Zx3CgS
=g3dD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----