Re: security requirement for multi6

[Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

>>>>> Still, I think this new kind of denial of service is bad enough 
>>>>> that we shouldn't allow this to happen, even though other denial 
>>>>> of service attacks are also possible today. Hopefully we'll be 
>>>>> able to do something about that in the future.
>>>>
>>>> Just because there are DoS possibilities that we do not yet know 
>>>> about, does not mean that we should not fix the ones that we do 
>>>> know about, and also know how to fix.
>>>
>>> What is your point?
>>>
>>> The current situation is that there are DoS possibilities that we
>>> (I, at least) already know about.
>> In the id/loc separation case?
>
> No.
>
>> That are not in Eriks draft?
>
> No.
>
>> Then
>
> Then?

Then please post to the list.

- - kurtis -

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.2

iQA+AwUBP7Oi8qarNKXTPFCVEQIQKQCgxWvB0b1kQrrsqzJrx7RTNJ5PGXEAmK86
uZw4Gjj7lwDReFrygF84sxM=
=lKvs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----