RE: Mobility observation

["Christian Huitema" <huitema@windows.microsoft.com>]

> Which such an approach one could continue to use the MIPv6 MN-HA
> protocol for updating the home agent (this is independent of
> the MN-CN aspects), and use the multihoming mechanism
> to update correspondents with the set of locators.
> A side effect of this is that a mobile node can provide multiple
> care-of-locators to the correspondents to allow failover.

If I understand correctly, we would use a modification of the MN-CN node
to carry a list of available "alternative addresses/locator". If a HA is
available, it would simply be included in the set, with properties such
as "low speed, high availability". That seems attractive.

-- Christian Huitema