[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Shared Locator Address Pool (SLAP) protocol proposal



Spencer,

SD> stopped. But we've clearly considered providing a common capability
SD> for all transports in a situation that was architecturually similar,
SD> and the ECM pictures had congestion management in a shim underneath
SD> multiple transports (the same point in the stack, if I get the SLAP
SD> vision).

I think it is the same point in the stack, yes. In fact, the discussions
that led to my suggestion using "connection id" as the fine-grained
identifier for a pool also prompted me to realize that the new, IP
Endpoint (IP-EP) module also needs to provide common congestion control,
as I commented in my parallel proposal to SLAP.


SD> The rules for using the SLAP STICK, and especially for modifying it,
SD> need to be pretty clear. We know how to write clear rules, we just
SD> need to make sure we do it this time!

Yup!


d/
--
 Dave Crocker <dcrocker-at-brandenburg-dot-com>
 Brandenburg InternetWorking <www.brandenburg.com>
 Sunnyvale, CA  USA <tel:+1.408.246.8253>