[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Routing based proposals [Re: Draft of updated WG charter]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 2004-01-11, at 18.29, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> On 11-jan-04, at 15:31, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>
>> So far, nobody has come to multi6 with a proposal based on changes to
>> inter-domain routing. Absent any such proposal, we won't be working
>> on this approach. So the challenge to people who think there is an
>> IDR-based option is clear. Until then, I suggest we don't waste our
>> time discussing it.
>
>> Actually, we don't have any proposals based on any kind of change to
>> routing algorithms, as far as I can see.
>
> I proposed aggregation based on geography inside service provider
> networks a while ago. I still think this is a useful approach, but I
> observed a decided lack of consensus in this area...
this is hardly a change of the routing algorithms though.
- - kurtis -
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3
iQA/AwUBQAJifKarNKXTPFCVEQKtwQCfQg+NgVVSzcJwQ6n10KRElUtzEgEAoNbQ
hH17oniLhmb/nvocdKNPWFCV
=TNLY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----