[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: threats ID
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Ohta-san,
On 2004-01-20, at 01.42, Masataka Ohta wrote:
>
>> IMHO both drafts complement themselves pretty well because Erik &
>> Tony's
>> draft essentially analyze the threats from a IP layer perspective and
>> Masataka's draft analize the threats from a transport layer
>> perspective.
>
> The problem for Erik and Tony, then, is that IP layer of
> multi6 is no different from the current one.
I am not really following what you are arguing for. Do you mean to say
that
a) Eriks draft is incorrect?
b) Eriks draft is not complete?
c) Eriks draft adds security that is not relevant? (I.e does not
increase security)
d) Eriks draft adds security beyond what we have today (but perhaps at
too high cost)?
e) Something else?
Best regards,
- - kurtis -
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3
iQA/AwUBQAzdn6arNKXTPFCVEQKzHQCeLF20H/oT+QSwIKUN8Q3MFtD3ov4AoKqx
ujyIDtpPyj/cmjUbp/gd87gI
=Xl/I
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----