RE: threats ID

["marcelo bagnulo" <mbagnulo@ing.uc3m.es>]

> In the first case, what is hijacked is binding between home and care
> of addresses, which is not a connection.

Exactly, it is state that concerns the node as a unit, so the complete
identity of the node is affected

> You can still call it a
> connection, but its meaning is totally different from connection
> of TCP or SCTP.
>

Exaclty, this is why i am saying that threats are different.

One case is when the layer 3 identifier is hijacked and a different thing is
when a tcp connection is hijacked

So, what Brian is proposing AFAIU is to analyze the threats concerning these
two different cases and compare them in a the threats draft

regards, marcelo

> > threats are different and security required is different
> >
> > ( i am really tring to agree with your draft here :-)
>
> Thanks.
>
> 							Masataka Ohta
>
>
>