Re: threats ID

[Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 2004-01-21, at 00.18, Masataka Ohta wrote:

>
>>> All the shim layers are working at least at layer 4 that there
>>> is no point to say layer 3.5
>
>> I believe NOID and certainly ODT allow layer 4 to work without 
>> changes,
>
> You can believe so, just as you can believe NAT allow layer 4 to work
> without changes.

I think there is a notable difference. In my reading you are using NAT 
very loose for all forms of address rewrite. NAT to me does static 
rewrites, with no form of signaling. Especially breaking referrals by 
hiding the "true" address to the outside world. Most (if not all) 
id/loc proposals here (claims) that referrals do work. There is a hugh 
difference, referrals is a crucial component of any multi6 solution. 
This was also pointed out in the comments by Patrick.

- - kurtis -

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3

iQA/AwUBQBC6e6arNKXTPFCVEQImvwCcDoBM5177jO1C6WQ++TucSj1pEDAAoNTG
1svbaU1MeroTte30Y61qcmfD
=aO7Q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----