RE: threats ID

[<john.loughney@nokia.com>]

My comment is that, as far as I know, there is no specified layering
architecture endorsed by the IETF.  When you look at the collection
of protocols, including things like MPLS, to IPsec, TLS, RTP, etc.,
it seems rather pointless to come up with a strict interpretation of
Internet protocol layering.

If there is a real reason for this debate, I would be be happy to
be enlightened.

thanks,
John

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Masataka Ohta [mailto:mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp]
> Sent: 24 January, 2004 14:45
> To: Loughney John (Nokia-NRC/Helsinki)
> Cc: shep@alum.mit.edu; multi6@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: threats ID
> 
> 
> john.loughney@nokia.com wrote:
> 
> > Hi Tim,
> > 
> > I agree & I also wonder if this debate is really achieving anything.
> 
> As both of you are unaware of the IPSEC architectural RFC, debates
> related to IPSEC architecture with you is assured not to achieve
> anything.
> 
> So?
> 
> 							Masataka Ohta
> 
> 
>