[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: threats ID

To: "Ayyasamy, Senthilkumar \(UMKC-Student\)" <saq66@umkc.edu>
Subject: Re: threats ID
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 00:04:30 +0100
Cc: Multi6 List <multi6@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <5EF7D95E17BDAD4A968C812E5ABC390B0110824F@KC-MAIL4.kc.umkc.edu>
References: <5EF7D95E17BDAD4A968C812E5ABC390B0110824F@KC-MAIL4.kc.umkc.edu>

On 25-jan-04, at 11:10, Ayyasamy, Senthilkumar ((UMKC-Student)) wrote:

Also,if FQDNs can handle referral task,

Not really, as a single FQDN can map to more than one host and the reference may need to point to one of them rather than the group.

NAT can be extended to provide a scalable site-multihoming solution

Yeah right. I'll believe it when 1000000000 people are running this and it turns out to 1. work and 2. be scalable.

( Paul Francis IPNL is an example.)

Reference?

References:
- RE: threats ID
  - From: "Ayyasamy, Senthilkumar \(UMKC-Student\)" <saq66@umkc.edu>

Prev by Date: RE: PReserving ids when changing providers (was:RE: to be draft-ohta-multi6-8plus8-00.txt)
Next by Date: RE: PReserving ids when changing providers (was:RE: to be draft-ohta-multi6-8plus8-00.txt)
Previous by thread: RE: threats ID
Next by thread: RE: threats ID
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread