RE: I-D ACTION:draft-coene-multi6-sctp-00.txt

[<john.loughney@nokia.com>]

Hi Kurt,

> Having the proposals outline if they are enough as stand-alone or as 
> complements or needs complements, should be an important part of the 
> self-evaluation. Which of the alternatives are desired should be part 
> of the architectural evaluation. And we need to get there...

Sounds good to me.
 
> > Finally, there have been some interesting ideas on how to transition SCTP
> > on the ietf.org mailing list, I am not sure if they should/could be 
> > discussed in this document. If so, I can try to capture some of them 
> > when we update the document.
> 
> Transition is part of the questions in Eliots draft.

We have some thoughts, but we can certainly provide more ideas on transition
suggestions when we update the draft.  We'll flag this as something to
add in the draft.

John