[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: New multi6 draft: WIMP

To: Jukka Ylitalo <jukka.ylitalo@nomadiclab.com>
Subject: Re: New multi6 draft: WIMP
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 10:46:08 +0100
Cc: Multi6 List <multi6@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <Pine.NEB.4.58.0402251130150.11536@n2.nomadiclab.com>
References: <Roam.SIMC.2.0.6.1077576158.9678.nordmark@bebop.france> <403AFF0F.4030304@piuha.net> <Pine.NEB.4.58.0402251130150.11536@n2.nomadiclab.com>

On 25-feb-04, at 10:36, Jukka Ylitalo wrote:

Yes. Actually, I find Jukka's numbers a bit surprising. SHA1 is used

Thanks for correcting me Jari. The question is about microseconds,
not milliseconds.

So you can do a SHA-1 hash chain length 5 in 0.5 microseconds??? That seems awfully fast, just 1000 clockcycles...

Follow-Ups:
- Re: New multi6 draft: WIMP
  - From: Jukka Ylitalo <jukka.ylitalo@nomadiclab.com>

References:
- Re: New multi6 draft: WIMP
  - From: Erik Nordmark <Erik.Nordmark@sun.com>
- Re: New multi6 draft: WIMP
  - From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
- Re: New multi6 draft: WIMP
  - From: Jukka Ylitalo <jukka.ylitalo@nomadiclab.com>

Prev by Date: Re: New multi6 draft: WIMP
Next by Date: Re: port blocking (was Re: CELP (was RE:) )
Previous by thread: Re: New multi6 draft: WIMP
Next by thread: Re: New multi6 draft: WIMP
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread