Re: on the point of mobility & multihoming

[Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>]

[ post by non-subscriber.  with the massive amount of spam, it is easy to
miss
  and therefore delete posts by non-subscribers.  if you wish to regularly
  post from an address that is not subscribed to this mailing list, send a
  message to <listname>-owner@ops.ietf.org and ask to have the alternate
  address added to the list of addresses from which submissions are
  automatically accepted. ]


john,

jlnc> Dave,


jlnc> I still worry about feature-creep in Multi6.  Should a multi6 be
jlnc> a floor polish & a desert topping?

only if you want to lick the floor.

but seriously, you cannot imagine how much I share your concern for
feature creep.

what i've discovered in this topic is an equal fear of the potential
to have too much redundant, and possibly conflicting, mechanism,
because related problems were not solved with common mechanism.

but, yes, the mantra of: timely, simple, useful
is paramount.

d/
--
 Dave Crocker <dcrocker-at-brandenburg-dot-com>
 Brandenburg InternetWorking <www.brandenburg.com>
 Sunnyvale, CA  USA <tel:+1.408.246.8253>