Re: on the point of mobility & multihoming

[Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>]

Kanchei Loa wrote:

> > Thus, in my proposal, details of possible mobility solution is
> > dropped, though minimal explanation on why a bit is reserved is
> > given.
> >
> > 							Masataka Ohta
>
>
> In my opinion, you just hit an important issue of multi6 architecture, which
> this WG is supposed to work on first.

I'm afraid you miss my points.

> If we take Dave Croker's scenario
> (suggested by Geoff Huston) and generalize it, the problem space is the same
> as depicted in Geoff's slide (page 3) of "An Architectural View of Multi6
> proposals"

Dave and Geoff completely misunderstand the relationships
between M6 and MIP.

Worse, they don't recognize that shim layer approaches are
making the the IP layer connection oriented by let it maintain
states of connections.

Geoff's presentation is nothing more than rhetorical combinations
of layers without analyzing architectural implications.

Ignore their documents.

						Masataka Ohta