Re: multihoming goals and lear-multi6-things-to-think-about?

[Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 2004-03-09, at 07.49, Pekka Savola wrote:

> Hi,
>
> As I mentioned in the meeting, I think there is a problem in
> understanding the multihoming goals RFC, as evidenced by a couple of
> solutions describing e.g., how they solve traffic engineering problem.
> (That is, we're interested of *site* traffic engineering, not *node*
> TE.)
>
> Should we include a section in
> draft-lear-multi6-things-to-think-about which tries to briefly
> describe (again :) the actual goals of the multihoming goals RFC -- or
> should we just stick to asking a few pointed questions in
> draft-lear-... ?
>
> Opinions?

I think the pointed questions makes more sense. There is no point in 
using draft-lear to explain 3582.

- - kurtis -

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3

iQA/AwUBQE1+CKarNKXTPFCVEQJjpwCdG+URmbkl4KHNmrGL/GSGpYb22moAoORo
/ct0ZcmDNj7XQVAvOyZoNsKW
=roZ9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----