Re: two perspectives on "site" multihoming

[Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 2004-03-10, at 07.12, Kanchei Loa wrote:

> If you compare basic mechanisms to achieve host agile multihoming and
> mobility, the difference is null. My point is that if  mobility is 
> treated
> as a component outside multihoming, the "mobile node" attitude is 
> going to
> bias toward network agile solution, which is more deployable at large 
> site,
> where network expertise is abundant. Small to medium site would prefer 
> host
> agile solution because network administration tasks are kept at 
> minimum or
> don't exist at all.

I am not arguing that we should leave the "mobile aspect" out. I am 
arguing that we need to take one step at a time.

For all I know, we haven't even decided if we are looking for one 
solution, multiple solutions, a flag-day-solution or a phased approach. 
Once we are starting to agree on the various architectural aspects and 
analysis, the threats models and get input from other groups - we can 
answer those questions, as well as what the relationship between 
mobility and multihoming is.

- - kurtis -

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3

iQA/AwUBQE7K6aarNKXTPFCVEQKsKgCgth+HYlAq53D2BZWQWdlx/T+gLQsAoNFZ
CrfzOlSaBLe4lgutxYLdzIDi
=Y9x2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----