Re: on the point of mobility & multihoming

[Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>]

On 10-mrt-04, at 8:55, Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote:

> I actually would like to
> leave mobility our for now. The scope of multi6 is wide enough as it
> is. Let's look at this problem first.

> I am just afraid that if we start mixing mobility in from the
> beginning, we will be in way over our heads...

That was what I was trying to say in the part that you quoted.  :-)

But that doesn't mean we should continue to ignore mobility forever as 
there is significant overlap.