Jim's suggestion looks good for me.
I would like to attend this meeting at that time.
Daniel
------- Original Message -------
Sender : Bound, Jim<jim.bound@hp.com>
Date : Apr 17, 2004 08:16
Title : RE: New proposal for multi6 interim meeting
just as note june 14th is same date US IPv6 Summit begins and if you all
want to do this I can probably get a room for the day via the IPv6 Forum
to be used in Santa Monica. The summit is for newbees so not suggesting
that is useful to anyone. see
http://www.usipv6.com/ very nice place for a meeting too and holiday
after :--) a few of the folks here will be there too :--)
/jim
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-multi6@ops.ietf.org
> [mailto:owner-multi6@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Kurt Erik Lindqvist
> Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 5:15 AM
> To: Iljitsch van Beijnum
> Cc: Multi6; Brian E Carpenter
> Subject: Re: New proposal for multi6 interim meeting
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> On 2004-04-11, at 19.24, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
>
> > On 11-apr-04, at 19:07, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> >
> >> After analyzing the various responses received, we now
> propose a one
> >> day meeting on Monday June 14 in California, either Santa
> Monica or
> >> the Bay Area.
> >
> > Is it useful to have an interim meeting 6 weeks before the
> next IETF
> > meeting? This leaves no time to publish new drafts.
>
> The intention of the interim meetings is to meet and discuss
> two drafts that might make it to WG documents and have a
> through discussion on the architectural analysis draft. I
> don't think these discussions will trigger the need for new
> drafts, but they might trigger updates of existing ones. And
> for that there should be enough time.
>
> I do agree it's tight, but we (Brian should get the credits for this
> thoguh) have really struggled to find suitable dates.
>
> > Also, having both the interim meeting and the next IETF meeting in
> > more or less the same place distributes the travel burden very
> > unevenly.
>
> I agree, but this was the way most people could attend. :-(
>
> - - kurtis -
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGP 8.0.3
>
> iQA/AwUBQHpd+6arNKXTPFCVEQIfaQCg3eu/0azNCbzed/HDGL7lNx43R2EAoI1Y
> XDUnVo9rMGDSj77fN6j60JiB
> =ztM5
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
>
Regards
Daniel (Soohong Daniel Park)
Mobile Platform Laboratory. SAMSUNG Electronics