[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: stable addressing

To: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: stable addressing
From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:31:55 +0200
Cc: Multi6 List <multi6@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <20040420170316.GC16214@login.ecs.soton.ac.uk>
References: <5B58696DB20B9140AD20E0685C573A6402992FB9@xch-nw-09.nw.nos.boeing.com> <20040420170316.GC16214@login.ecs.soton.ac.uk>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 2004-04-20, at 19.03, Tim Chown wrote:

> Why not just allocate Fortune 1000 companies a /32 each anyway? ;)

Well then maybe we at least would get over that 1000 routes 
barrier...:-)

- - kurtis -

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3

iQA/AwUBQIfXX6arNKXTPFCVEQKxpQCfbhFZaWCnd2/POjQByIUqd+Zz/TgAnjfz
duleOIJoVnqAmWwFxHnsQLEi
=f/uJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:
- RE: stable addressing
  - From: "Fleischman, Eric" <eric.fleischman@boeing.com>
- Re: stable addressing
  - From: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: stable addressing
Next by Date: RE: stable addressing
Previous by thread: Re: stable addressing
Next by thread: RE: stable addressing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread