RE: stable addressing

[jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa)]

    > From: "Bound, Jim" <jim.bound@hp.com>

    > The DOD has required the goal that all operations must be fully
    > transitioned to IPv6 operational by 2008. ... So the DOD is bit more
    > than the word enamored with IPv6 as Eric stated.

Jim, I have an entire file full of projections from you (and other IPv6
proponents, to be fair) explaining how IPv6 was going to take over by time T
- almost all T now long ago history.

If you have some useful technical point to make, please make it. But let's
skip the IPv6 propoganda, OK?


    > What we have to do here is fix the multihoming problem or forces in the
    > market will fix it for us.

Do you have any information on how the market will "fix the multihoming
problem", if things here don't happen quickly enough? I'm very interested as
to what technical approaches you see happening in that case.

	Noel