[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: architecture draft

To: Allison Mankin <mankin@psg.com>
Subject: Re: architecture draft
From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>
Date: Tue, 4 May 2004 17:04:56 +0200
Cc: Multi6 List <multi6@ops.ietf.org>, Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
In-reply-to: <E1BL0tp-000IHg-S5@psg.com>
References: <E1BL0tp-000IHg-S5@psg.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

	Allison,

On 2004-05-04, at 16.27, Allison Mankin wrote:

> P.S. I suspect that discussions of evolving the transport protocol 
> services
> will not be on-topic.   We can redirect to the Transport Working Group
> tsvwg@ietf.org, if desired.

No, we are busy enough with site-multihoming :-)

Seriously, no , but the discussion of various forms of impact on the 
transport protocols will have to be covered. And we appreciate all 
input we can get.

Best regards,

- - kurtis -

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3

iQA/AwUBQJexHKarNKXTPFCVEQK16QCgk08o0npNnSpgiYd+RQM2iO9A+AIAoJIm
6tLjoLkoYFjXV++IPyZ7BL1L
=dWSh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:
- Re: architecture draft
  - From: Allison Mankin <mankin@psg.com>

Prev by Date: possible additional issues for Elliot's draft (was RE: F1000 requirements?)
Next by Date: When is a wedge a wedge? [Re: architecture draft]
Previous by thread: Re: architecture draft
Next by thread: Re: architecture draft
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread