Re: Comments on draft-nordmark-multi6-threats-01

[Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>]

On 11 jun 2004, at 18:13, Erik Nordmark wrote:

> > We can't let ourselves be constrained by arbitrary features of the
> > current architecture. If the features are important, sure, we must
> > support them. But having to do so just because it can be done today
> > makes has the potential to disqualify very useful multihoming 
> > solutions
> > without good reason.

> Is there something in section 8 that you think is placing too strong
> requirements?

Since it uses the word "could" I don't think there is a requirement 
here at all, so I have no problem with it. Also, I think Brian is right 
in saying that site multihoming and anonimity have a low correlation.