Re: draft remarks

[Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>]

Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:

> On 19-jun-04, at 20:35, <john.loughney@nokia.com> wrote:
>
> > I'd hesitate explicitly calling out MPLS-TE - there are otherways to
> > 'manage' a network.  I'd make it more general:
>
>
> >  4.2  Does your solution impact existing network management tools and 
> > techniques?
>
>
> [...]
>
> > add:
> >     What are the implications for proxies?
>
>
> Hm, this way the document is quickly becoming "list the way your 
> solution interacts with RFCs 1 - 3800". 

Right.  I agree.  We can't predict all pitfalls, but for instance, to 
tie into another message from Iljitsch, perhaps we should point out that 
if a mechanism uses some nifty hack on addressing and someone is doing 
MPLS-TE based on source address, you could have a problem.  On the other 
hand, I'm also perfectly happy removing the question in its entirety.

Eliot