[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: optimum routing table size

To: Multi6 <multi6@ops.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: optimum routing table size
From: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 23:57:44 +0200
In-reply-to: <40D88C21.6030208@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Organization: IBM
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0406191425470.6330-100000@netcore.fi> <200406191307.26836.ripe-lst@eirconnect.net> <20040621162012.GD6204@Space.Net> <200406211820.15292.ripe-lst@eirconnect.net> <20040621173141.GH6204@Space.Net> <3717B75A-C40F-11D8-BBBB-000A95928574@kurtis.pp.se> <40D8185A.7030900@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <20040622114911.GK6204@Space.Net> <40D8237D.5020301@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <20040622123509.GT6204@Space.Net> <40D8333F.8000804@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <C67E1A50-C47C-11D8-AE1C-000A95CD987A@muada.com> <40D88C21.6030208@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113

I don't think this topic is relevant to the next steps planned
for this WG, and it is a very old story that has been discussed
often for more than ten years.

Brian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: optimum routing table size
  - From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>

References:
- Fallacy by Kurt (was Re: IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)")
  - From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
- Re: Fallacy by Kurt (was Re: IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)")
  - From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
- Re: Fallacy by Kurt (was Re: IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)")
  - From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
- Re: Fallacy by Kurt (was Re: IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)")
  - From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
- Re: Fallacy by Kurt (was Re: IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)")
  - From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
- optimum routing table size
  - From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
- Re: optimum routing table size
  - From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>

Prev by Date: Re: Fallacy by Kurt (was Re: IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)")
Next by Date: Re: Fallacy by Kurt (was Re: IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)")
Previous by thread: Re: optimum routing table size
Next by thread: Re: optimum routing table size
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread