Re: Fallacy by Kurt (was Re: IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)")

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Masataka-sama and all,

Masataka Ohta wrote:

> Jeff Williams wrote:
>
> >   Open to some does not mean "all the way open" to others.  So restrictions
> > for the sake of how far "Open" discussion is, is dependent sometimes on
> > whom is discussing what aspect of relevant issues on a topic area...
>
> So true.
>
> >   That said, I liked your draft.  I still must study it more however.
>
> Thank you.

  Your welcome, but also  you earned it.

>
>
> However, such statement without technical reasoning is no better
> than the emotional postings by Brian Carpenter.

  Understood to a degree.  My comment was also meant to be
in reference to already discussed by others, your draft, including
the already stated technical reasoning and disagreement...

>
>
> So, let's have discussions on technical points with verifiable
> reasons.
>
> Note, for example, that I oppose any proposal trying to import
> *THE* swamp of v4.

  I also.  v6 is a very different technically, animal than v4.  I am however
not a fan of v6 vs v8.  But that is another discussion all together.

>
>
>                                                         Masataka Ohta

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
    Pierre Abelard

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
 Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827